This week is a strange one, not only due to a never before seen financial crisis. Google’s connectivity has been somewhat buggy and remains slow:
PING google.com (64.233.187.99): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=0 ttl=241 time=1399.419 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=1 ttl=241 time=144.358 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=2 ttl=241 time=134.214 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=3 ttl=241 time=149.826 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=4 ttl=241 time=143.050 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=5 ttl=241 time=135.344 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=6 ttl=241 time=131.657 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=7 ttl=241 time=131.736 ms
64 bytes from 64.233.187.99: icmp_seq=8 ttl=241 time=131.036 ms
^C
— google.com ping statistics —
10 packets transmitted, 9 packets received, 10% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 131.036/277.849/1399.419/396.585 ms
Lena: fluppel$ ping niquille.com
PING niquille.com (82.103.128.110): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 82.103.128.110: icmp_seq=0 ttl=51 time=52.532 ms
64 bytes from 82.103.128.110: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=52.269 ms
64 bytes from 82.103.128.110: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=50.811 ms
64 bytes from 82.103.128.110: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=52.106 ms
64 bytes from 82.103.128.110: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=51.795 ms
^C
— niquille.com ping statistics —
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 50.811/51.903/52.532/0.596 ms
Lena: fluppel$ ping nzz.ch
PING nzz.ch (194.40.226.40): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 194.40.226.40: icmp_seq=0 ttl=117 time=19.846 ms
64 bytes from 194.40.226.40: icmp_seq=1 ttl=117 time=9.550 ms
64 bytes from 194.40.226.40: icmp_seq=2 ttl=117 time=9.866 ms
64 bytes from 194.40.226.40: icmp_seq=3 ttl=117 time=27.635 ms
64 bytes from 194.40.226.40: icmp_seq=4 ttl=117 time=27.267 ms
^C
— nzz.ch ping statistics —
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 9.550/18.833/27.635/7.953 ms
Google should be around the corner in Zurich (usually). Is this or even this related (although Google’s responses are all non-network issues)? Interesting thought about interdependency on third parties.
No Comments
Leave a Reply